Maybe
It is IN_CREATE I am using. This is for files that are created in the NFS
exported folder.
Yes I don't think this will help you.
-- Regards David Ward On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 12:35:12 +1000, Andrew Pollock <andrew-incron_at_andrew.net.au> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 01:24:23PM +1100, David Ward wrote: >> I will check when I get to work. I am pretty sure I use IN_MODIFY in my >> setup at work. >> The setup is a client NFS mounts a share off a server, drops in a file >> with its hostname as the file name. The server than runs a script with >> that file/hostname. > > I'm not sure if NFS insulates you from it, but my understanding of the > difference between IN_MODIFY and IN_CLOSE_WRITE is that an IN_MODIFY event > is emitted for each and every write that hits the filesystem. So let's say > a > large file is being copied between systems, and you're watching that file > on > the destination system. You'll see numerous IN_MODIFY events. If you copied > the file based on one of them, you wouldn't get the entire file. > > That's the beauty of IN_CLOSE_WRITE. You know the file that has been > modified, is now closed. > > I think I've managed to answer my own question elsewhere in this thread as > to why I was seeing the behaviour that I was seeing. > > regards > > AndrewReceived on Tue Jun 05 2012 - 22:14:21 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jun 05 2012 - 22:14:21 CEST